Contamination

                    It is the tension  between creativity and skepticism that has produced the stunning and unexpected findings of science.     —Carl Sagan 

Home Abstract Background Question Hypothesis Objective/variable Material Procedure Results Analysis Discussion Sources of Error Conclusion Future Research Appendix Reference Acknowledgement

 

Due to contamination reducing the number of trials that could be used for trend setting, the reliability of the lab results were slightly reduced. As can be seen from the results of Jan 17th/07 for 60min sonication, the bottom two wells of the first column on the 96-well plate gave extraordinarily high OD readings. This may mean that while the E. Coli was inhibited by the ultrasound or spectinomycin, a foreign bacteria species with a higher MIC than E. Coli was induced into and reproduced in the solution. Or, more likely, the higher OD readings can be explained by the possibility that some of the E. coli that was intended for the second column had jumped into these two wells. The described is a minor source of error (SOE), because contaminated wells are relatively easy to identify and eliminate from account. Contamination occurs most easily when the pipette tips come into contact with a material that was not planned for it to come into contact with, such as human skin and cloth. With this known, this SOE is easily reduced.  

Next

Enhancement of Antibiotic Action with an Application of Ultrasound
by Liz Meng: lizmeng10@hotmail.com
Victor Feng: haovictor_feng@hotmail.com
Sir Winston Churchill High School, Calgary.AB

29/04/2007