1.
Test for the inhibition curve of E.coli generated by ultrasound

Figure 1. Average bacterial growth of E. coli in 96-well plates after being sonicated and then incubated
for 24hrs versus different time lengths of sonication (antibiotic was not
applied) represented in a line graph. Data drawn from Table 1.
The preliminary test results for the inhibition curve of E.
coli by ultrasound as demonstrated in figure 1 showed no decrease in the
E. coli growth compared to the control in this specific time length (within
60min), contrary to what was expected. There may be an increase in E.
coli growth as exposure time length to ultrasound increases, but the first
point and the last point on the graph are within the error bars of each other,
making it difficult to interpret if there is indeed an increasing trend. Note
that none of the three main tests involved in this study was repeated, due to
time restrictions.
2.
Test for MIC of spectinomycin to
obtain a sub-inhibitory concentration
Figure 2. Average bacteria growth in
96-well plate after 24hrs of incubation with an application of spectinomycin
versus different antibiotic concentrations (no sonication) presented in a line
graph. Data drawn from Table 2.
When spectinomycin was applied at
concentrations below 32μg/mL, E. coli
growth gradually and evenly decreased as antibiotic concentration increased. At
spectinomycin concentrations 32 μg/mL to 64μg/mL, there
is an abrupt decrease in E. coli
growth. Followed by a gradual decrease in E.
coli growth when the concentration of spectinomycin was applied from 64μg/mL
onwards. (See Fig.2) The MIC of spectinomycin is therefore 64μg/mL, and 32μg/mL
will be used in the synergy test with ultrasound, so as to make certain that the
bacteria is not inhibited by the antibiotic alone.
3. Test for synergy between
spectinomycin and ultrasound

Figure 3.
Average E. coli growth in 96-well
plate 24hrs after being treated with spectinomycin and ultrasound versus
different sonication time lengths, presented in a line graph. The spectinomycin
concentration used was one deviation below the MIC, at 32μg/mL. Data drawn
from Table 3.
In figure 3, there
appears to be no significant decrease/increase in trend of the bacterial growth
as sonication time increases – the bacterial growths at different sonication
time lengths vary very slightly as compared to the control. The slight variation
in the bacterial growth can be attributed to
experimental errors.