Project
Information
Abstract Project Summary
Background
Purpose Scientific Thought Hypotheses
Apparatus and Materials
Genetically Engineered KM110red Herpesvirus
Methodology
Procedure for Cell-Line Splitting
Procedure for KM110r Infection
Procedure for Immunofluorescent Microscopy
Imaging
Statistical Analyses
Proliferation Assay Analyzed Data
Major Results
Graphed Results
Discussion of Statistics
Controls and Variables
Conclusions
Discussion
Discussion of KM110r Efficacy
Successes and Failures
Sources of
Error and Data
Limitations
Future
Research
Applications
Glossary
Bibliography
Acknowledgements
|
Independent (Manipulated) Variables
- Cells being tested (hFOB, U2OS, or
MIX)
- Status of KM110r
Infection
- Incubation
temperature
- Time Period Post-KM110r
infection
Dependent (Respondent)
Variables
- Total cell count in each
image
- Number of dead cells in each
image
- Presence or absence of “red”
signal in RFP channel
- Morphological changes in hFOB
cells
Controlled Variables
- All temperature trials were repeated,
resulting in over 1000 images and corresponding
values.
- hFOB and U2OS cell lines are both
bone cells
- Extremely large sample sizes were
used (1000 images)
- U2OS and hFOB cell lines were kept
under the same conditions in the same incubators
- U2OS and hFOB cell lines were
never exposed to any air other than that inside the Cell and Virus
Hoods.
- The same inoculum was used for all
infections.
- The same formula was used to
calculate the ratio at which to split cells for the entire
experimentation period
- A Level II Biohazard Hood was used
for all splitting and infecting procedures to ensure that no
contamination of the cell lines would occur
- When one of each wells (hFOB,
U2OS, and MIX) were being infected, their counterparts were
mock-infected (all of the same steps were performed except for infection
itself).
- The same splitting and infecting
procedures were carried out at every stage of the
experiment.
- Three fields of view were imaged from each
well.
- Each field of view was imaged in
bright field, and RFP and GFP where necessary.
- All images were taken at 10x
magnification.
- Each channel (bright field, GFP,
and RFP) had a unique exposure level, maintained for the duration of the
experiment.
- All images were taken with the
same microscope.
- All images were
contrast-enhanced.
- The images were counted by the
same observer.
- The images were viewed on the same
computer to be counted.
- A manual cell counter was used;
only one person did the manual counting
- The same media (DMEM+10% FBS) was
used over the course of experimentation.
- The same concentration of Trypsin
(1x) was used over the course of
experimentation.
Back to Home Page - Natalie Raso
|