I found out that my hypothesis was right. The filter with fewer holes, smaller holes, and a larger surface area trapped the most dust and let the least amount through. However, the filter with more holes, larger holes, and a smaller surface area trapped the least amount of dust and let the most through. This happened because in the filter with a smaller surface area, it is flat which can stretch it out a bit making the holes in it wider. Therefore, the filter with a larger surface area worked the best.
Also, this happened because the filter had fewer holes. If the filter has fewer holes, it has a better chance of letting less dust through because if there are less, there are less openings for the dust to get through. If the filter has fewer holes and smaller holes it has an even better chance because the holes are smaller so less dust will go through. I concluded that the filters with fewer holes, smaller holes, and a larger surface area work the best and that they are the best dust busters.
