| STRESSED OUT STRUCTURES | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Gateway Structures
3D Geometric Structures: Which is Strongest?
Testing Buildings: Which Design is Strongest?
Stronger Buildings: Supports
Stronger Buildings: Buttresses and Struts
Earthquake Simulation: Columns
PROBLEMS WITH MY EXPERIMENT
|
PART FIVE Making Buildings Stronger: Buttresses and Struts PROCEDURE A rectangular prism was put together with a triangular prism to make a little building but it had two flying buttresses on two sides. They were made of plasticine balls and bamboo skewers. The building’s strength was tested with sand bags. They were placed along the centre of the top bamboo skewer until the model broke. The weight of the bags used was added up and recorded in a chart. The same experiment was done with three flying buttresses on two sides. Finally, a little building was made with a rectangular prism and a triangular prism on top, with three flying buttresses, and with three roof struts to make the top stronger. For each test, three trials were done. The results from Part Four were used for a building with one flying buttress.
CONCLUSIONS The more flying buttresses the stronger the building. The cathedral with three flying buttresses takes 500g more weight to knock down than the cathedral with one flying buttress. It takes 133g more sand to break the cathedral with three flying buttresses then the one with two flying buttresses. There wasn’t much difference in strength between the cathedral with two flying buttresses and the one with three flying buttresses. Two flying buttresses can support the building almost as well as three. The cathedral with 3 flying buttresses and three roof struts takes almost twice the amount of sand to break that the one with three flying buttresses took.
|
Peaked Roof building; rectangular prism & triangular prism: 1. One buttress
2. Two Flying Buttresses
3. Three Flying Buttresses
4. Three Flying Buttresses and Three Roof Struts
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||