The advantages of an enzymatic method above and beyond the application
of bacteria have been particularly manifest in respect to flexibility
in mixed and hazardous environments – most compounds inhibitory
to microbial growth would not affect an enzyme, unless it was
an enzyme inhibitor. There are fewer limitations on delivery and
it is better suited for continuous flow reactors, among many other
industrial applications. In enzymatic reactions there is however
a constant need for cofactors, which act as reducing and oxidizing
agents. Bacterial enzymes capable of degrading high molecular
weight hydrocarbons are furthermore limited to adding onto the
terminal or second carbons of alkanes. If these terminal ends
are unavailable, further bioremediation is capped, thus enzymes
capable of breaking carbon-carbon bonds in the middle of an alkane
would affect bioremediation of polymers and compounds such as
asphaltenes.
Directed evolution involves introducing mutations into a gene
or genes and then looking for improvements over the original or
wild type enzyme. Methods of introducing transformations vary
widely, but some of the most common include mutator strains, radiation
and errorprone Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR). Because of the
complexity of enzyme structure and function, most mutations, even
single conservative mutations distant from the active site, can
delegate effects from substrate recognition up onto catalysis
itself. Therefore we are led to test large numbers of mutants
with screening. A typical enzyme of 300 amino acids has a total
of 20^300 possible combinations, a surpassing number. Fast methods,
typically colorimetric or spectrophotometric, are asked to qualify
genetic properties among tens of thousands of variations in an
assay.